Parliament hurriedly intervened in the issue that called for more serious thought
Renowned historian K.N. Panikkar on Wednesday said that the stand taken
by Parliament in the controversy over a cartoon on B.R. Ambedkar was
disturbing as it rather hurriedly intervened in an issue that called for
more serious thought.
“The members of Parliament have reacted with rare unanimity and an
unwarranted sense of outrage to the cartoon included in a textbook
published by the NCERT. If they had not done so they would have realised
that the text book in question was an excellent example of creative
pedagogic innovation, which is rare in our school system,” Dr. Panikkar
told The Hindu. He said that the cartoon was a thought-provoking
lampooning of one of the major events in the history of modern India in
which Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar were caricatured (but
it did not imply any insult to either of them).
Dr. Panikkar, a former Professor of History at Jawaharlal Nehru
University in New Delhi, said that some political leaders seemed to have
thought otherwise and members of all parties joined in a vociferous
protest.
“It appears that these over-enthusiastic members seem to have overlooked
that the cartoon was employed as a pedagogic device. In fact, what the
cartoon was critiquing was the slow pace of the process of
Constitution-making, which it conveyed much more effectively than an
authorial statement. The cartoon and the accompanying text could be used
to highlight the various interests the makers of the Constitution had
to contend with,” he said.
Dr. Panikkar said the MPs seemed to be oblivious of the ‘pedagogic
revolution' in school education. “Following the adoption of the National
Curriculum Framework (NCF), school education has turned
student-centred, with a view to stimulating their creative potential.
This textbook, along with several others in different subjects, were
prepared in pursuance of the NCF, in order to realise a challenging
pedagogic practice,” he said.
Describing that an impediment to the implementation of the NCF had been
the reluctance of scholars to undertake the arduous task of preparing
text books, Dr. Panikkar said that Prof. Suhas Palshikar and Prof.
Yogendra Yadav, two well-known scholars, accepted the challenge and
produced a textbook, which had very many positives. “They felt so
insulted by the attitude of the members of Parliament that they chose to
resign from the advisory position they held in the NCERT,” he said.
Dr. Panikkar said the Union Minister of Education added insult to injury
by welcoming their resignation, withdrawing the textbooks from
circulation, ordering an enquiry and promising to punish all those
involved with the preparation of the book.
“In order to sooth the ruffled feelings of the members, he also tendered
an unqualified apology, whereas he should have apologised to the
scholars for the intellectual insensitivity of his colleagues. Surely,
the Minister should know that the quality of education cannot be
improved without respect for scholarship,” he said.
Dr. Panikkar said civil society organisations had been rightly
expressing their concern over the reaction of sections of political
leaders to the cartoon in the textbook. “The supremacy of Parliament as
the symbol of the representative system of democracy is indeed
inviolable. But maintaining the supremacy also calls for the respect of
other institutions,” he said.
The Hindu
No comments:
Post a Comment