Search NEWS you want to know

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

US House votes to block funding for Libya

Bill to prohibit funds for US military operations in Libya unlikely to become law, but seen as snub to president.



The US House of Representatives has voted to prohibit the use of funds for US military operations in Libya.
Politicians adopted the amendment to a military appropriations bill by a vote of 248 to 163 late on Monday.
A number of members of Congress have expressed their dissatisfaction at Barack Obama's, the US president,  decision to go ahead with operations in Libya in March and to continue without congressional authorisation.

According to US law, the president must seek congressional authorisation to send US troops into combat and must withdraw the forces within 60 days if Congress has not authorised the military action.
The amendment, introduced by Democratic representative Brad Sherman from California, invokes the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law that limits presidential powers on sending troops abroad into combat zones without the consent of Congress.

Sherman's text states that "none of the funds made available by this act may be used in contravention of the War Powers Act."

Politicians must still approve the appropriations bill as a whole and the measure must still be approved by the Senate.
Al Jazeera Patty Culhane, reporting from New Hampshire, said: "This is going to be a bit of a shock for Obama administration as the vote was so overwhelmingly against allowing him to use the fund in Libya.
White House under pressure
The White House has been under rising pressure from congressional critics demanding details about US goals in Libya.
"President Obama might face an uphill battle because even his own party has been very concerned about his action in Libya," said Culhane.
"Lot of people, both in his party and Republican side, think that he has over-stepped his bound.
"[The] House of Representative's message to Obama: You can't use any money until you get our permission to continue in Libya."
"It doesn't mean US planes are necessarily going to stop flying, but it does mean that the president has to get back to Washington and try to convince the Senate not to go along with House of Representative," she said.
Gaddafi shelling
On Tuesday, Libyan troops fired several grad rockets from positions controlled by Gaddafi over the border into Tunisia, witnesses said, causing no damage.
"At least five rockets fell on Tunisian soil today in the Mrabeh. It was a heavy bombardment from Gaddafi's side of the mountains," Mohammed Nagez, a local trader, said.
Meanwhile, fighting has been going on between forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, and opposition forces on several fronts in Libya.

Click here for more of Al Jazeera's special coverage
The shelling an oil refinery in the western rebel-held city of Misurata appears to have hit the refinery's power generators but not its oil storage facilities.
Rebel fighters said they were making gains towards Zlitan from Misurata. Zlitan is one of three towns separating Misurata from the capital Tripoli.
Battles were also being fought in the Berber mountains southwest of Tripoli, in nearby Yafran, and at Dafnia near Misurata, rebel sources said.
Government forces posted a few miles east of Zintan, which remains under rebel control, fired Grad and Katyusha rockets at the town.
Rebel casualties
On Monday, Gaddafi troops killed at least 25 anti-government fighters on the frontline between Ajdabiya and Brega in eastern Libya, according to rebel sources.
The rebels have spent months trying to seize the strategic oil hub of Brega, which would open the road to Sirte, the Libyan leader's home town, and from there to the capital.
Dozens more fighters were wounded and transferred to a hospital in Ajdabiya, 160km south of Benghazi, the de facto capital of the rebels who have been fighting to overthrow Gaddafi since mid-February.
Brega boasts an important oil refinery which, once operational, could supply the east of the country with much-needed fuel to produce electricity.
Meanwhile, admiral Mark Stanhope, the head of Britain's royal navy, has said the navy could face logistical problems if NATO's mission goes on longer than another six months.
Elements of the campaign would have been cheaper and "much more reactive" if Britain had still had an aircraft carrier, he said.
Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies

No comments:

Post a Comment