Wednesday, June 29, 2011

British workers plan rare strike over pension reforms

Around 85 percent of schools in England and Wales, as well as job centers, tax offices and courts will go on strike in a response to David Cameron’s liberal polices and slashing spending which will lead to the loss of 330,000 jobs by 2015. (File Photo)
 
 
About 600,000 British teachers and civil servants were set to join a rare nationwide strike on Thursday in the country’s biggest walkout since the coalition government took office last year.

Four trade unions voted to take action on June 30 to protest against changes to pensions, in what one labor union warned could be the start of the most serious widespread industrial unrest in Britain since 1926.

Prime Minister David Cameron made a final effort on Tuesday to persuade the unions to abandon the strike, which will close or disrupt around 85 percent of schools in England and Wales, as well as job centers, tax offices and courts.

He insisted the proposed changes to make public sector workers work longer and contribute more to their pensions were necessary but fair as Britain faced up to the challenges of an ageing population.

Mr. Cameron -- leader of the center-right Conservative party, which formed a coalition with the Liberal Democrats in May 2010 -- also argued the strike was premature because talks between unions and ministers were still continuing.

“To those considering strike action, at a time when discussions are ongoing, I would say to you: these strikes are wrong -- for you, for the people you serve, for the good of the country,” he said.

“It’s the changes we propose that are right,” he said.

The reforms would raise the public-sector retirement age to 66, increase employee contributions by 50 percent in some cases, and replace final salary pensions with one based on average career earnings.

Mr. Cameron insisted there was no option, warning that “the pension system is in danger of going broke.”

But there is widespread anger among public sector workers, who have already been hit with a two-year pay freeze and face more than 330,000 job losses by 2015 as the government slashes spending to eliminate a record budget deficit.

Their frustration is underscored by the fact that Thursday’s national walkout will be the first ever by Britain’s ATL education union in its 127-year history.

“It’s a huge deal,” a spokeswoman told AFP, adding that their members were “furious.”

Some 78,000 of the school and college staff in the ATL are affected by the pensions changes, which it argues are unaffordable and could deter people from entering the profession.

About 220,000 members of the National Union of Teachers and 55,000 from the University and College Union have also been called out on strike, as have 250,000 civil servants in the Public and Commercial Services Union.

The unions are planning protests across the country, including in London, as well as picnics and breakfasts in solidarity with the strikers.

They are not being joined by Unison, the largest public sector union in Britain with 1.3 million members, which has opted to continue talking.

“But if the government does not move, we will move toward strike action this autumn,” a spokeswoman said.

Unison general secretary Dave Prentis earlier this month warned of waves of industrial action by public sector workers. “It will be the biggest since the general strike (of 1926),” he told The Guardian newspaper.

Ed Miliband, the opposition Labour leader, has warned, however, that strikes “must always be the very last resort,” and said the unions had yet to win the argument.

The government has also indicated it might tighten rules on when unions can call strikes, sparking comparisons with Margaret Thatcher’s reforms that hobbled the unions in the 1980s.

Britain loses far fewer working days to strikes than the European Union average, and the last major strike over pensions was in March 2006, by 1 million local government employees.

A ComRes survey this week found 50 percent backed more restrictive strike laws, but 49 percent said unions had a legitimate reason to strike over pensions.
AFP
 

No comments:

Post a Comment